In a powerful assertion of cultural sovereignty, Ethiopia has accelerated its campaign to reclaim priceless artifacts plundered during the colonial era, placing heritage preservation at the heart of its national agenda. Spearheading this endeavor, the country’s Heritage Office has submitted a comprehensive inventory of looted relics to UNESCO, seeking international cooperation and legal recourse to prevent their auctioning abroad.
A centerpiece of recent successful repatriations is “Tsehay,” the country’s first home-built airplane, returned from Italy, a symbolic restoration after its looting during the fascist occupation. Equally poignant are the recovered mantle of Ras Desta Damtew, the Ethiopian Order of the Star, and the armor of Emperor Tewodros II, objects that transcend mere objects as they anchor the nation’s collective memory and historical continuity.
Read also: SADC leadership transition tests regional commitment to peace, integration and resilience
These efforts speak to a broader quest for cultural sustainability, ensuring that Ethiopia’s heritage is preserved for future generations while fostering a strong sense of identity. Cultural sustainability, emerging as its own critical pillar alongside environmental, economic, and social development, underscores how heritage shapes societal values and resilience.
But Ethiopia’s ambitions go further than retrieval. The government is preparing for a new round of UNESCO nominations, including landmarks like Al-Nejashi Mosque, the ceremonial Ethiopian coffee tradition, and the staple crop onset. These nominations underscore an understanding that heritage preservation needs institutional anchoring, honoring both tangible and intangible cultural assets to build a holistic narrative of sustainable identity.
Still, reclaiming relics is no simple triumph; it plays out against a global backdrop riddled with legal and diplomatic complexity. While instruments like the UNESCO 1970 Convention and UNIDROIT’s Repatriation Convention provide frameworks, their retroactive reach remains limited, making the restitution of colonial-era artifacts a nuanced and often protracted process. Ethiopia’s forthcoming efforts to request the return of artifacts held by the universities of Oxford and Cambridge, items seized after the 1868 Battle of Magdala, underscore these diplomatic challenges. Those artifacts include clothing, medieval manuscripts, swords, and shields of immense cultural and political significance, and Ethiopian officials argue that their repatriation would restore a sense of pride to younger generations.
Meanwhile, the scope of restitution efforts is broadening beyond state-led processes. The Scheherazade Foundation’s crowdfunding campaign to repurchase Ethiopian treasures, including tabots, religious texts, and ceremonial shields looted in 1868, demonstrated grassroots power in cultural recovery. Though non-governmental, efforts like these reinforce how heritage restoration can align with sustainable development goals by reinvigorating national pride and empowering heritage-led tourism and education programs.
These developments also correlate with urgent gaps in Ethiopia’s legal and institutional heritage framework. Over decades, proclamations, from the first 1966 law protecting antiquities to the 2014 legislation that began recognizing intangible heritage, have struggled to keep pace with the country’s rich cultural diversity and federal administrative structure. Scholars highlight weaknesses in heritage site conservation, emphasizing challenges from insufficient funding and management to urbanization pressures and climate-related deterioration. Without robust institutional support, even repatriated artifacts risk neglect, highlighting a critical tension in sustaining heritage beyond retrieval.
Perhaps most pressing is the connection between heritage and economic sustainability. Repatriated relics and preserved heritage sites have the potential to boost tourism, create jobs, and revitalize local economies. UNESCO underscores how returning artifacts allows African nations to document their histories on their own terms, fostering scholarly research and cultural tourism that can sustain communities. However, this requires both legal protection and proactive promotion.
Read also: Elephants exited from South African zoos, sparking debate over access and conservation
Ethiopia’s renewed drive to reclaim its cultural treasures is therefore not merely about righting historical wrongs, it is an act of sustainable nation-building. By restoring artifacts, strengthening heritage institutions, and promoting intangible practices, the country is crafting a resilient cultural foundation that underpins social cohesion, educational depth, and economic vitality. In this light, heritage repatriation becomes a vehicle for sustainable development, where safeguarding history serves as a catalyst for future growth.
