The European Commission has launched a new Call for Evidence on its proposed “environmental omnibus” package, a sweeping effort to simplify EU legislation on circular economy, industrial emissions, and waste management. While framed as an internal administrative reform, this move carries potentially far-reaching implications for African economies and exporters deeply connected to European value chains.
Set for adoption in late 2025, the new package follows the Commission’s “Omnibus I” initiative released earlier this year, which seeks to reduce reporting burdens under flagship regulations such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Together, these changes mark a turning point in the EU’s regulatory framework—one that could significantly shape Africa’s trade, climate finance access, and policy alignment.
For African countries, the most immediate pressure point is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The EU’s carbon border tax mechanism, already entering its transitional phase, will begin to affect exports such as aluminium, steel, cement, fertiliser, and electricity by 2026. Countries like Egypt, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and South Africa—all significant commodity exporters, are expected to face rising compliance demands and the risk of reduced competitiveness. A report by the South African Institute of International Affairs warns that CBAM could cost some African economies up to 0.9% of GDP and reduce exports to the EU by up to 5.7%, depending on the scale of implementation and readiness to measure embedded carbon emissions.
Read also: EU simplifies Green Taxonomy, sending mixed signals to Africa’s sustainability push
The European Commission’s latest environmental push seeks to ease the administrative load on EU-based businesses, but African producers and governments may soon face increased complexity. The potential harmonization of rules under the EU’s Waste Framework Directive and extended producer responsibility requirements could lead to stricter demands on African exporters seeking market access—particularly in sectors like packaging, textiles, and electronics.
At the same time, African countries that have begun developing circular economy strategies—such as Rwanda, Kenya, and Ghana—may find opportunity in aligning with evolving EU standards. For these early movers, harmonized reporting frameworks and transparent environmental criteria could enhance investor confidence and trade access. But for others, the pace and depth of regulatory change in Brussels may outstrip domestic readiness, especially where capacity for emissions tracking, waste data reporting, and environmental permitting remains limited.
This evolving landscape has prompted growing calls for African engagement in EU consultations and negotiations. With the environmental omnibus proposals expected to be finalized in Q4 of 2025, now is a crucial moment for African governments and regional blocs like the African Union and African Continental Free Trade Area Secretariat to assert their interests. Experts argue that Africa must push for longer transition periods, technical support, and the redirection of carbon pricing revenues from mechanisms like CBAM back into the continent to support climate adaptation and decarbonisation infrastructure.
The European Commission has stated that its goal is to reduce administrative burdens “without undermining environmental objectives.” Yet from an African perspective, the risk lies in uneven capacity to meet rising regulatory expectations, which could entrench economic inequalities under the banner of climate action.
As EU legislation becomes a de facto global benchmark, African voices must be included in the room where these rules are being reshaped. The continent’s future competitiveness, climate resilience, and green industrialization could depend on it.
Read also: European Union gives EFRAG more time to revise sustainability reporting rules
