On September 23, 2025, an arbitral tribunal convened under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ordered Niger to refrain from selling, transferring or facilitating the transfer of uranium produced at the Somaïr mine, a decisive intervention in a dispute that has pitched the West African country against France’s state-linked nuclear group, Orano. The ruling also called for the release of Orano’s country representative, who has been held since May despite a Niamey appeals court ordering his release in July, underscoring how legal, political and human-rights questions are now entangled with raw mineral value.
The Somaïr operation, near Arlit in Niger’s arid north, is not a marginal asset. Orano has long held a roughly 63% stake in the venture while the remainder is managed through Niger’s state miner SOPAMIN; at full capacity Somaïr accounted for about 15% of Orano’s uranium supply. The joint venture’s production has been choked by months of blocked exports, raids on company offices and a formal nationalization announced in June 2025 after the junta moved to wrest control, steps that pushed Orano to warn the market the unit risked bankruptcy as operating costs continued without normal sales.
Read also: China’s new climate pledge sparks global debate, raises stakes for Africa’s energy future
Those operational facts map onto hard numbers. World Nuclear Association statistics show Niger’s mined uranium output fell from roughly 2,020 tones in 2022 to 962 tones in 2024, a slump that cuts its contribution to global mine supply to a fraction of what it was only a few years earlier. By contrast, Namibia produced 7,333 tones in 2024 and Kazakhstan and Canada together still supply the lion’s share of the world market. The immediate effect of Niger’s turmoil is therefore less an absolute shock to global volumes than a redistribution of where producers and purchasers will look for supply and how confidently they can sign long-term contracts.
For Niger, however, the arithmetic is sharper at home. Official trade data show uranium exports to France were worth about $204 million in 2023; historically uranium has dominated the country’s foreign exchange earnings even as recent oil output has begun to reshape fiscal flows. The junta argues nationalization is a corrective to decades of unfair sharing and a way to raise state revenue; critics counter that seizure, detention of foreign staff and export blockades destroy investor confidence and immediate cash flows, leaving public services and environmental liabilities exposed to budgetary strain.
Seen from the continent, Niger’s case is a local illustration of a broader Sahel pattern. In recent months, Burkina Faso, Mali and others have tightened state control over mining assets, rewriting fiscal terms, or transferring mines into state-owned entities. Those moves reflect anger at perceived asymmetries in historical concessions, the politics of post-coup regimes, and fresh overtures to alternative partners such as Russian and Chinese firms prepared to operate in high-risk jurisdictions. The geopolitical upshot is twofold: African states are asserting sovereignty in ways that can enhance domestic capture of mineral rents, but they are also narrowing the circle of credible private and public partners able to meet the technical, environmental and capital demands of modern uranium mining.
Read also: UNGA Climate Summit pushes nations to sharpen climate pledges as COP30 nears
The sustainability calculus here is complex. Uranium is not a conventional export that simply translates into school roofs or clinics; it is a fuel whose lifecycle creates enduring environmental and health obligations. International bodies and past field studies document contaminated tailings, threats to water supplies and the high cost of remediation in Arlit and similar mining towns. If state takeovers are not paired with transparent environmental governance, monitoring and budgeted reclamation plans, the social and ecological price of nationalization may be high even as political rhetoric celebrates regained control.
Markets will respond too. Spot uranium prices have already reacted to supply anxiety this year, and large buyers, notably France, which relies on a domestically oriented nuclear fuel chain, must recalibrate procurement strategies. That recalibration often means leaning harder on dominant suppliers such as Kazakhstan and Namibia, or accelerating purchases on the spot market, both of which push price volatility and create fresh leverage for major producers. For African policy makers who frame mineral nationalization as a revenue strategy, the lesson is practical: securing a bigger slice of resource income depends on sustaining production, honoring environmental responsibilities, and keeping logistics channels open so that revenue materializes rather than remains a political statement.
The ICSID order will not be a neat endpoint. Legal processes may take years, and political relations between Niamey and Western partners remain strained. What matters for sustainability across Africa is less the immediate arbitration outcome than the institutional choices that follow: will nationalized mines be run with technical competence, transparent revenue management and enforced environmental safeguards, or will short-term rents fund political consolidation while long-term liabilities accumulate in health, water and land? That question will determine whether the Somaïr episode is a step toward equitable resource governance or a costly precedent in which mineral sovereignty is asserted at the expense of sustainable stewardship.
Read also: Kenya unveils clean energy policy to achieve 100% green power by 2030 and net-zero by 2050
