The European Commission on November 20, 2025, proposed sweeping amendments to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), seeking to repair a framework that policymakers in Brussels describe as cumbersome for firms and confusing for investors. This major overhaul, announced primarily to reduce regulatory friction and curb greenwashing within European markets, could have significant ripple effects on the flow of much-needed sustainable finance into African economies by simplifying the compliance pathway for asset managers.
The central feature of the proposal is the replacement of the existing complex system (often referred to by its Article 8 and Article 9 classifications) with a clearer, three-tier categorization for financial products: Sustainable, Transition, and ESG Basics. This new approach, shaped by extensive stakeholder feedback, aims to improve clarity for retail investors and tackle the inconsistent expectations that plagued the current framework.
Products marketed with ESG terms must now ensure at least 70 percent of their portfolio aligns with their declared sustainability strategy, and they must eliminate exposures to specified harmful activities, including companies violating human rights or exceeding limits on fossil fuel involvement. The Commission explains that this structure will “simplify the investment journey of retail investors and help them make informed investment decisions,” simultaneously strengthening the integrity of the sustainable finance ecosystem.
Read also: Four African nations join Global Climate Fund-backed platform hub to mobilise trillions
Crucially, the amendments signal Brussels’ move to reset Europe’s sustainable finance rulebook by cutting disclosure complexity. The proposal plans to largely delete the requirement for entity-level reporting on principal adverse impacts (PAI) for the majority of financial market participants. The intention is to eliminate duplication with the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), ensuring only the largest financial market participants must disclose their environmental and social impacts. This alignment, according to the European Commission, will “streamline corporate disclosures” and lower the data collection burden on smaller providers.
For the African continent, where nearly 90% of climate-related investments are funded by foreign entities, this simplification is critical. Current EU regulatory measures, though well-intentioned, have often inadvertently directed capital toward more developed economies where ESG data is readily available, due to the high reporting standards they impose on European asset managers.
Citing the African Development Bank and the UN Economic Commission for Africa, the continent needs up to $1.3 trillion per year to fully implement sustainable development goals, a figure that dwarfs the current flows. Simplifying the rules and reducing the administrative costs for European financial entities, particularly those considering frontier markets, could potentially reduce the “regulatory risk aversion” that currently limits capital allocation to high-impact African projects.
Furthermore, the new Transition category is highly relevant to African industrialisation, applying to investments that support companies progressing toward credible transition paths. Analysts note this could unlock financing for African firms and infrastructure projects that are currently high-emitting but essential for development, allowing them to finance measurable improvements in climate, environmental, or social outcomes.
If adopted following negotiations with the European Parliament and Member States, this proposal would reposition the SFDR as a sharper, more navigable regime, one that seeks to ensure that global financial capital—including the substantial funds originating from Europe, can be mobilized more effectively to meet sustainability objectives both at home and in the Global South.
