African governments and health planners heading into the COP30 cycle are confronting a problem that blends climate risk, technological uncertainty and the urgent need for dependable healthcare: how to power future smart-city hospitals when traditional energy systems can no longer guarantee reliable electricity, heating, cooling or sterilization.
As global climate commitments tighten, a growing body of research and policy, most recently the Belém Health Action Plan (BHAP), is elevating green hydrogen electrolyzers as a cornerstone of climate-resilient medical infrastructure across the continent.
Launched at COP30, BHAP positions energy innovation at the heart of adaptation strategy. The accompanying WHO Special Report on Climate and Health issues a stark warning: one in 12 hospitals worldwide may face climate-related shutdowns. Floods, heatwaves and grid instability could jeopardize routine procedures and emergency care alike, with Africa among the most exposed regions.
Read also: The wins and loses for Africa at COP30 from its conclusion
The report calls for rapid investment in low-carbon, climate-proof infrastructure and highlights hydrogen-enabled smart hospitals as a critical frontier. PAHO reinforced this message by urging countries to treat smart hospitals, facilities that integrate renewable energy, digital systems and resource-efficient design, not as aspirational projects but as essential public-health safeguards.
Brazil’s introduction of a National Health Sector Adaptation Plan, aligned with BHAP, and roughly USD 300 million in new philanthropic commitments signal a shift toward embedding resilience directly into health-system financing.
However, policy momentum is only part of the picture. For African cities experimenting with smart-grid concepts and decentralized power systems, the question is less whether hydrogen will matter and more which electrolyzer technologies can meet the reliability, cost and integration requirements of hospitals operating in high-risk zones.
A recent study evaluating four leading electrolyzer types, alkaline (ALK), proton exchange membrane (PEM), solid oxide (SOEC) and anion exchange membrane (AEM), offers rare clarity. Using analytic hierarchy process methodology, the assessment weighs efficiency, cost, durability, scalability, hydrogen purity and integration flexibility to identify the most viable options for health-sector deployment.
In many African cities, clinicians already work through blackouts by torchlight or rely on diesel backups that are costly, polluting and increasingly unreliable. During a heatwave in Maputo last summer, a nurse described how a sudden power dip forced staff to manually ventilate newborns until generators stabilized, a reminder that energy insecurity has immediate human consequences. Hydrogen-based systems, when paired with renewables, offer a path out of this cycle.
At the center of that promise is the ability of electrolyzers to convert intermittent solar and wind power into storable hydrogen. Once fed into fuel cells, the hydrogen can generate steady electricity for life-support machines, diagnostics, lighting and communications. In disaster-prone areas where grid failures routinely coincide with medical surges, the appeal of on-site, renewable-powered electricity is obvious: the system does not depend on fuel deliveries, cooling-tower water levels or fragile transmission lines.
Beyond power, hydrogen expands the range of climate-resilient services hospitals can run internally. The heat produced by fuel cells can stabilize temperatures in operating theatres and critical-care units, reducing dependence on electric heating during cold spells. Waste heat can in turn drive absorption chillers, ensuring accurate humidity and temperature control in high-risk areas where infection risk spikes with even minor deviations.
Perhaps most intriguingly, electrolytic hydrogen can feed on-site synthesis of hydrogen peroxide, enabling hospitals to produce their own vaporized sterilization agents for surgical tools, isolation units and intensive care environments. In regions where supply chains are regularly disrupted by storms or flooding, this capacity could transform infection-control practices.
Against this operational backdrop, the study’s findings carry significant weight. SOEC systems emerge as the strongest overall performer, particularly for facilities seeking high electrical efficiency and integration with existing heat-recovery systems. Although operating at higher temperatures, SOECs offer superior conversion efficiency and strong long-term economics when paired with steady renewable supply.
Alkaline electrolyzers, long considered a workhorse technology, follow closely behind; they provide a well-understood, cost-effective option with acceptable efficiency and reliable scalability, attributes crucial for health systems trying to balance ambition with budget constraints. PEM systems perform solidly but fall just short on cost and material sensitivity, while AEM technologies lag due to their relative immaturity and lower durability.
The analysis also hints at future vulnerabilities. All four technologies rely on materials whose supply chains are exposed to climate, geopolitical or market volatility. Planners in African cities must therefore consider not just upfront performance but the long-term availability of catalysts, membranes and high-grade ceramics. As climate impacts intensify, the reliability of these components may shape the trajectory of hydrogen deployment as much as efficiency metrics do.
For policymakers and hospital administrators, the message is clear: hydrogen-based systems can materially strengthen resilience, but only if technology choices are grounded in both economic realism and operational needs.
Investments should prioritize SOEC and alkaline electrolyzers, given their balance of performance and cost, while planning frameworks must integrate hydrogen production with fuel-cell power systems, combined heat and power units and hospital-scale absorption chillers. This alignment is particularly vital for high-risk zones, neonatal wards, surgical suites and isolation units, where even brief energy interruptions endanger lives.
The human dimension remains central. In African cities where hospitals double as community anchors during climate emergencies, resilient power is not a technological luxury but a social obligation. By embedding green hydrogen into the design of smart-city health systems, governments can reduce reliance on fossil-fuel backups, lower operational emissions, and protect the clinicians and patients whose work and wellbeing depend on uninterrupted, stable conditions.
COP30’s emphasis on health resilience has set a clear direction. The task now is converting technological potential into funding strategies, procurement standards and on-the-ground systems that keep hospitals running when climate stress peaks. If implemented with precision, hydrogen electrolyzers could become one of the most consequential tools for safeguarding Africa’s urban health future; quiet, clean and dependable, even when the grid goes dark.
Engage with us on LinkedIn: Africa Sustainability Matters
