Botswana, widely known as Africa’s leading diamond producer, has declared a public health emergency after critical shortages of medicines and medical equipment left hospitals and clinics unable to meet patient needs. The declaration, made by President Duma Boko on August 25, has exposed not only the fragility of Botswana’s healthcare system but also the deep interconnections between natural resource dependence, economic resilience, and social sustainability across the continent.
For decades, Botswana has been hailed as a success story in Africa, using diamond revenues to fund education, infrastructure, and health. Diamonds still account for around 80 percent of exports and nearly a third of government revenues. However, with global diamond demand collapsing, sales from Debswana, a joint venture between the government and De Beers, fell by nearly 50 percent last year. The government has since paused operations in some mines, citing unsustainable production costs.
The downturn has had ripple effects beyond the economy. Public healthcare, heavily reliant on revenues from the diamond sector, is now underfunded. In recent weeks, the Ministry of Health confirmed shortages of essential drugs for treating cancer, HIV, tuberculosis, hypertension, diabetes, and other chronic illnesses. Surgical supplies such as sutures and dressings have also run dangerously low.
This situation underscores the sustainability dilemma facing resource-dependent economies: when global markets fluctuate, public goods such as healthcare, education, and social protection become exposed to crisis.
President Boko announced that military oversight would be introduced to stabilize supply chains, alongside the release of 250 million pula (about USD 18 million) in emergency funds to secure urgent medical supplies. However, debts of over 1 billion pula owed to private hospitals and suppliers remain a heavy burden.
To cope, the Ministry of Health has been forced to prioritize life-saving interventions while postponing elective surgeries and non-urgent procedures such as joint replacements, organ transplants, and specialized referrals abroad. Even Botswana’s chronic medicine dispensing program with private pharmacies, essential for long-term patients, has been suspended.
This reallocation of services highlights a troubling sustainability challenge: how can African countries maintain continuity of essential health services during economic shocks? The crisis in Botswana shows the risk of reactive, crisis-driven management rather than resilient, preventive planning.
The health system’s fragility has been aggravated by reduced external funding. For years, Botswana’s globally lauded HIV response was heavily subsidized by U.S. aid programs, including PEPFAR, which financed about one-third of national HIV services. Recent aid cuts have left critical gaps in HIV and tuberculosis care, worsening the strain from shrinking diamond revenues.
Read also: Tanzania blocks Soda Ash mining project at Lake Natron to protect Flamingo breeding grounds
This dual dependency, on both natural resources and foreign aid, illustrates a structural weakness in Africa’s development models. Sustainability, in this context, means reducing reliance on volatile income streams and external goodwill by building resilient, locally funded health systems.
Across the continent, resource-dependent economies face similar risks. Falling oil prices destabilize Nigeria and Angola, while declining cobalt and copper demand affects Zambia and the DRC. When commodity prices tumble, revenues earmarked for health, education, and social services shrink, threatening the very pillars of human development and sustainability.
Economic diversification is not optional; it is essential for protecting public health, ensuring equity, and securing resilience against global market volatility. Strengthening domestic resource mobilization, investing in pharmaceutical manufacturing, and promoting transparent procurement systems are urgent steps needed to avoid similar crises elsewhere.
Despite the severity of the crisis, Health Minister Dr. Stephen Modise struck a note of guarded optimism, insisting that “this is not insurmountable.” He pledged that the government would stabilize supplies and restore services. Yet, without structural reforms that connect economic management with social protection, Botswana risks repeating this cycle.
The Botswana case illustrates how sustainability is not only about environmental stewardship but also about ensuring that economic wealth translates into resilient systems capable of withstanding shocks. Resource-rich countries across Africa must confront the uncomfortable truth: mineral wealth cannot guarantee sustainable public services unless revenues are diversified, managed prudently, and reinvested in ways that build long-term resilience.
Botswana’s public health emergency, born out of both economic strain and systemic dependency, offers the continent a critical warning. True sustainability lies in building systems, economic, social, and health, that can endure beyond the boom-and-bust cycles of natural resource markets.
