China has launched a new foreign debt financing program designed to funnel international capital into green and low-carbon projects, a move that underscores the growing importance of cross-border climate finance in accelerating the energy transition.
The pilot, unveiled by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), will run across 16 regions including Beijing, Shanghai, Hebei, and Qingdao. Under the initiative, non-financial enterprises will be permitted to raise overseas funds more freely and channel them directly into climate-aligned projects, with expanded financing limits and simplified foreign debt services.
SAFE emphasized that the scheme balances “openness and security” while serving the high-quality growth of the real economy. In practice, that means allowing enterprises more flexibility to attract international investors while ensuring oversight that keeps debt risks under control.
For China, the program is a tool to accelerate its decarbonization targets by mobilizing global capital at scale. But for Africa, the launch carries a broader signal: international finance can and should play a more direct role in funding low-carbon transitions in developing economies.
Africa’s financing needs for climate adaptation and mitigation run into the hundreds of billions annually, yet the continent attracts only a fraction of that amount. If mechanisms similar to China’s were adapted to African contexts, they could help unlock concessional and commercial flows for renewable energy, clean transport, and industrial decarbonization. By setting clear rules, safeguards, and green eligibility criteria, governments could create the enabling environment that reassures investors while ensuring integrity.
Read also: Verra and S&P Global launch next-gen carbon registry with big implications for Africa
Already, several African countries are experimenting with frameworks that echo China’s emphasis on credibility and openness. Kenya has established carbon market regulations that require government authorization for Article 6 trades, Ghana has executed its first transfer of mitigation outcomes, and Rwanda has rolled out a national carbon registry. South Africa, meanwhile, has introduced its first Climate Change Act, setting the stage for sectoral emissions caps and just transition planning.
China’s pilot suggests another pathway: opening controlled channels for overseas capital to flow directly into green projects without bottlenecks. For African economies struggling with high capital costs, such an approach could ease financing constraints while aligning with long-term development and energy security goals.
As the world edges closer to its 2030 emissions deadlines, the question for Africa is whether it can design similar models that attract patient, affordable international capital, without compromising sovereignty or exposing countries to unsustainable debt. The answer may lie in learning from experiments like China’s while tailoring them to Africa’s unique realities.
