China has introduced a new green finance taxonomy that redefines the categories of projects eligible for sustainable investment. The framework, known as the Green Finance Endorsed Project Catalogue, was jointly released by the People’s Bank of China, the National Financial Regulatory Administration, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission. It comes into effect on October 1, 2025.
The move consolidates previously scattered rules for green bonds and loans into a single system and is designed to standardize how Chinese capital identifies “green” projects. It is also intended to improve the efficiency of green asset management and lower the cost of screening eligible projects.
Though domestic in scope, the catalogue is likely to shape how Chinese lenders and investors engage with overseas markets—particularly Africa, where China remains one of the largest infrastructure and industrial finance partners.
China’s updated taxonomy introduces new classifications, expanding beyond renewable energy and pollution control to include resource efficiency, ecological restoration, and green consumption. It also adds a transitional category that allows financing for industries considered polluting but which are moving toward lower-carbon operations.
For African governments and developers, these adjustments could quietly redraw the boundaries of what qualifies for Chinese green capital. Infrastructure and industrial projects that don’t align with the revised categories risk being deprioritized, even if they are technically climate-aligned. On the other hand, sectors such as clean transportation, waste-to-energy, and low-emissions manufacturing could now be more attractive to Chinese financiers.
Read also: African exporters face new rules under upcoming EU circular economy act
China’s taxonomy differs in key areas from frameworks adopted in the EU and other jurisdictions. Its thresholds for “green-enabling” activities are less strict, offering more flexibility in supporting transitional projects. While this makes the taxonomy more adaptable in contexts with fewer regulatory safeguards—such as parts of sub-Saharan Africa—it also creates inconsistencies in global green finance classification.
Africa does not yet have a unified taxonomy of its own. Countries like South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt have made progress, but most of the continent still relies on foreign taxonomies to access green capital. This creates a mismatch in expectations between African borrowers and international lenders. The release of China’s taxonomy only sharpens this challenge.
With China being a key player in Africa’s energy and industrial development, the new classification system effectively becomes a new filter through which future investments will be evaluated. African financial institutions, project sponsors, and regulators may now need to track which activities are prioritized under the Chinese system—and whether their domestic policies are structured to accommodate them.
The long-term risk is one of fragmentation. As global taxonomies multiply, African economies that fail to adopt a position may find themselves excluded from overlapping green finance flows—not for environmental reasons, but due to procedural misalignment. Alternatively, countries that anchor their taxonomies to one dominant system—such as China’s—may find themselves exposed to shifts in policy priorities they had little influence over.
China’s update comes as other jurisdictions—such as the EU, Singapore, and India—push ahead with their own definitions of sustainable finance. Meanwhile, the UK has paused its own taxonomy efforts. The competition to define global green finance standards is becoming as much about political influence as environmental targets.
Africa is caught in the middle of this race. The continent’s financial institutions, trade blocs, and regulators face a clear decision: either remain reactive to external frameworks or develop an interoperable taxonomy tailored to African realities. Without it, the ability to access green capital—whether from Beijing, Brussels, or New York—will remain constrained.
China’s new taxonomy sets a clear precedent. It defines the rules of engagement for one of the world’s most active green financiers. African stakeholders will now need to respond—technically, strategically, and institutionally—if they intend to remain in the conversation.
Read also: CHAN 2024: How African football is driving sustainable infrastructure in East Africa
