The European Commission has opened a €5.2 billion package of Innovation Fund calls aimed at fast-tracking low-carbon industry, allocating €2.9 billion to net-zero manufacturing technologies, €1.3 billion to a third European Hydrogen Bank auction, and €1 billion to a pilot industrial process-heat auction.
Announced in early December, the funds, drawn from EU Emissions Trading System revenues and topped up by national co-funding from Germany and Spain, will use a mix of grants and fixed-premium auctions to lower the price gap between fossil-fired processes and electrified or hydrogen-based alternatives. The moves are designed to speed deployment at scale, anchor manufacturing capacity in Europe and create sustained revenue streams for early projects while testing market mechanisms that could be copied elsewhere.
The package, on its face is a pooled industrial subsidy: large sums, competitively awarded, with scoring that privileges emission reductions, replicability and cost-effectiveness. Behind that, it is an attempt to translate climate policy into a procurement signal strong enough to rewire investment decisions for steel, cement, chemicals and other energy-intensive industries.
The Net-Zero Technologies call targets manufacturing scaleups, from battery and electrolyzers to heat-pump deployment, while the hydrogen auction offers ten-year premium contracts to verified renewable and low-carbon hydrogen producers. The industrial heat auction, the novel element, treats heat as a tradable abatement commodity, paying output-based premiums to the projects that deliver the cheapest tones of CO₂ abated.
For African policymakers and industrialists the announcement reads both as a warning and an invitation. Africa remains a small emitter by global standards, responsible for less than 3 per cent of energy-related CO₂ today and using roughly 6 per cent of global energy, yet demand is rising as economies industrialize and populations urbanize.
The continent’s industrial emissions profile is already concentrated: South Africa alone accounted for about 28 per cent of Africa’s emissions in 2023, followed by Egypt, Algeria and Nigeria. Those national patterns matter because process heat, electricity access and feedstock availability shape whether new factories are built with fossil boilers or with electrified, low-carbon plant.
The European package intensifies a long-running competition for capital and for the next wave of heavy industry. When financiers and equipment makers favor projects that can tap predictable revenue streams or long-term offtake contracts, the exact incentives the Innovation Fund provides, investors are more likely to back plant expansions in jurisdictions that combine clear regulation, quick permitting and accessible finance.
Europe’s auctions-as-a-service model and national top-ups are explicitly designed to reduce execution risk and standardize approvals, a competitive advantage that could shift future green industrial jobs and value chains toward markets that can match those conditions. That dynamic is already visible: recent years have seen some production, notably in cement and fertilizer, scale up in parts of North Africa where energy pricing and regulatory regimes are more favorable to export-oriented industries.
Egypt’s surge in cement and fertilizer exports between 2019 and 2024, for instance, underscores how energy-intensive manufacturing can relocate to jurisdictions with lower operational costs, even as it raises questions about transparency and emissions accountability.
Yet the practical barriers to an African green industrial transition are not only about capital chasing the best return. They are about the basic economics of heat, the architecture of grids and the availability of cheap, mass-produced equipment. Globally, heat accounts for almost half of final energy consumption and roughly 38 per cent of energy-related CO₂; much of that heat needs high temperatures that today are most cheaply produced by fossil fuels.
In Africa, where modern energy use per capita remains among the lowest worldwide, the first order of business for any decarbonization pathway is closing an infrastructure deficit: reliable electricity at scale, robust transmission, and industrial-grade renewables that can supply both power and process heat. The Innovation Fund’s emphasis on industrial heat, and its choice to trial output-based premiums, is therefore a test case that African governments and development banks should study closely.
There are two contrasting practical opportunities for Africa. The first is import substitution and cleaner domestic industrialization: countries that modernize industrial heat and retrofit existing plants with electrified heat or hybrid systems could cut local emissions, reduce exposure to volatile fossil fuel imports and create higher-value domestic jobs.
The second is export-oriented green commodities: Africa’s vast renewable resources, wind corridors in the Horn and Maghreb, solar in the Sahel and deserts, and coastal renewables, position several countries to supply low-carbon hydrogen or green ammonia to global markets. The European Hydrogen Bank’s auction model offers a template for guaranteeing offtake and revenue during scale-up, an important consideration for African projects that face higher perceived risks and cost of capital.
But to translate potential into pipelines, African projects will need stacked finance: concessional grants, guarantees to lower currency and political risk, and commercial lines that accept longer tenors while local markets mature.
The financing gap is decisive. Europe’s €5.2 billion is large by many standards, but it is calibrated to underwrite first-mover industrial deployments in a single trading bloc. African economies require a different mix: far more modest capital per project combined with technical assistance, procurement frameworks that aggregate demand, and regional approaches that build scale.
Read also: New Kenya youth environmental awards open to support grassroots climate solutions
Multilateral development banks and national development finance institutions will therefore need to design instruments that reduce the price of capital for industrial decarbonization while protecting local fiscal sustainability. In practice that means blending long-term concessional loans with output-based incentives, capacity building for engineering, procurement and construction, and standardized measurement protocols so small and medium projects can become bankable.
The Innovation Fund’s scoring for replicability and SME inclusion is a reminder that bespoke funding rules can tilt the table toward smaller developers, a lesson African policymakers can borrow when structuring their own support.
For business leaders, donors and finance ministers across Africa, the EU move is a reminder that climate policy now structures competitiveness. It is no longer sufficient to plan industrialization without a financing strategy for low-carbon process heat and decarbonized feedstocks. Practically speaking, that means governments should map their industrial clusters, quantify heat and electricity needs by temperature bands, and identify projects where early electrification or renewable heat retrofits are lowest cost.
African policymakers and financiers should watch the winners and the terms closely, not as passive observers but as students of a playbook they might adapt. The stakes are practical: jobs, balance-of-payments impacts from commodity exports and imports, and the long-term competitiveness of nascent manufacturing sectors across the continent.
