Artificial intelligence is quietly redrawing the boundaries of global conservation and for Africa, where nature and livelihoods are inseparably intertwined, the implications are profound. A new working paper, AI for Nature: How AI Can Democratize and Scale Action on Nature, produced by researchers from the World Resources Institute and Google, makes the case that the next frontier of climate and biodiversity protection will not be driven solely by policy or philanthropy, but by algorithms, if deployed inclusively.
The study’s central argument is that AI can democratize nature conservation by turning passive observation into participatory action. With fewer than 25% of countries having clear biodiversity action plans aligned to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, the researchers warn that data scarcity remains one of the biggest barriers to reversing nature loss. Artificial intelligence, they argue, could bridge this gap, automating millions of field observations, standardizing global reporting, and unlocking real-time insights that governments, businesses, and communities can use to protect ecosystems before they collapse.
Already, AI systems are reshaping what is possible in conservation. Platforms like Wildlife Insights, developed through a partnership between Google and conservation NGOs, have created the world’s largest database of camera trap images; 253 million and counting, while cutting processing time by over 800%.
Similarly, Global Fishing Watch uses AI to analyze ship movements and identify illegal fishing in real time. In 2024, Chile used this technology to fine 21 vessels violating seasonal closures, proof that digital transparency can strengthen environmental governance.
The working paper places particular emphasis on democratization: ensuring that AI’s benefits reach beyond labs and ministries into local communities. From citizen science apps like iNaturalist, which now powers over 100 million verified wildlife observations, to AI tools that translate nature data into local languages, the shift is toward participation.
“If AI can make monitoring and data access easier, then local people can manage and protect their environments faster than any external agency,” the authors note.
The report flags critical risks. The concentration of AI expertise in the Global North, biases in training data that could misrepresent African ecosystems, and the resource demands of large-scale computing. Without equitable access, the study warns, the “AI revolution for nature” could reproduce the same inequalities that have long constrained environmental action.
Read also: Deforestation puts 122 million West Africans at risk of water insecurity, New study warns
For Africa, the implications are double-edged. The continent holds 25% of the world’s biodiversity and some of its fastest-changing landscapes. However, conservation capacity is uneven. AI-powered mapping and monitoring tools could allow African nations to close data gaps that currently hinder carbon market participation and biodiversity reporting under the GBF. Kenya’s early adoption of remote sensing for forest monitoring, South Africa’s use of AI in wildlife management, and Nigeria’s exploration of satellite data for flood prediction are precursors to a larger movement.
The researchers advocate a three-part framework for equitable AI development: open access to high-quality data, investment in open-source models, and capacity sharing between AI developers and conservation practitioners. These pillars form a feedback loop, better data produce better models; open models empower local actors; and shared knowledge strengthens both.
In practical terms, this means enabling African conservation agencies and research institutions to train and deploy AI models locally. It also means integrating indigenous and local knowledge systems into AI design; a principle highlighted by the Inhaã-bé Indigenous community in Brazil, which co-developed Tainá, an AI archive preserving traditional ecological knowledge.
For Africa, where community-led conservation already safeguards vast ecosystems, such collaborations could redefine data sovereignty and inclusivity.
The report concludes with a challenge: AI must enhance, not replace, human stewardship of nature. It calls for sustained investment in biodiversity data, inclusive AI governance, and ethical standards that ensure energy and mineral use in AI infrastructure do not undermine the very ecosystems it seeks to protect.
Ultimately, the study reframes AI not as a technological marvel but as a governance tool, a way to make nature visible, measurable, and manageable at scale. This presents both an opportunity and a responsibility for Africa’s conservationists, to ensure that the continent does not remain a data consumer but becomes a data producer and innovator in the age of AI for nature.
Engage with us on LinkedIn: Africa Sustainability Matters
