As the world gears up for COP30 in Belém, Brazil, a troubling paradox is unfolding in the heart of the Amazon. A four-lane motorway, Avenida Liberdade, is being carved through a protected rainforest area—ironically, to improve access to a climate conference meant to champion environmental conservation. The move has sparked outrage among environmentalists, exposing the contradictions in global climate action.
The road That divides opinion
The Amazon, often referred to as the “lungs of the Earth,” plays a critical role in absorbing carbon dioxide and regulating the planet’s climate. Yet, in preparation for COP30, large swathes of trees are being cleared, replacing biodiversity with asphalt. The state government of Pará insists that the road’s construction predates Belém’s selection as the conference host and is not directly linked to COP30. However, critics argue that the timing of the project and its location—cutting through a protected area—make the connection undeniable.
To many, the construction project symbolizes the inherent contradictions of climate diplomacy. How can world leaders gather to discuss halting deforestation while standing on freshly cleared land? How can commitments to reduce carbon emissions be taken seriously when a key climate summit is quite literally paving over nature?
Read also: COP 29 and the Climate funding debate: What’s at Stake for developing countries
Balancing infrastructure and conservation
Brazilian authorities argue that the road is essential for the smooth operation of COP30, ensuring the arrival of international delegates and improving connectivity in the region. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has positioned Brazil as a leader in sustainability, vowing to end illegal deforestation by 2030. Yet, his administration faces a delicate balancing act—between economic development and environmental responsibility.
This tension isn’t new. Brazil has long struggled with the competing demands of conservation and industrial expansion. The Amazon is home to invaluable ecosystems, yet also a site for lucrative industries such as agriculture, mining, and infrastructure projects. The challenge lies in finding a way to modernize without eroding the very natural resources the world depends on.
What COP30 means for the Amazon
COP30’s location in Belém is a symbolic gesture, bringing global attention to the Amazon’s plight. But symbols alone are not enough. If the conference fails to address the urgent threats to the rainforest—including illegal deforestation, mining, and land grabbing—the event risks becoming an empty spectacle rather than a platform for real change.
Activists are calling for stronger protections, demanding that Brazil not only halt deforestation but also reforest damaged areas. Indigenous communities, who have been stewards of the Amazon for centuries, are urging world leaders to listen to their voices rather than corporate interests.
The road to COP30—both literal and metaphorical—will be a test of global climate commitment. Will the summit be remembered as a turning point in conservation efforts? Or will it go down as the conference that sacrificed trees for traffic? The answer lies in the actions taken, not just the promises made, in Belém.
